Have You Had a Happening Today?

In the 20th century, the surrealist movement served to express fantastical unconscious thoughts. In this blog, I want to proposition the idea that "happening" is not supposed to mean all things of random expression and that happening operates independently of time when explaining its specification. Dr. Redick is not explaining the term as an apparatus either for us to use to explain the momentary either. The happening can last as long as the happening lasts. So, Surrealism, id say is not a movement to compare to the situation the happening presents. Nor is it a means to educate someone on what the definition means, even though it is not unfounded to say happening can't occur in such a period or any time at all. The term happening is not limited to any frame of time or historical time period when explaining its meaning.

Happening (I would assume) has a stronger association with sensationalism.  Clearly, the happening requires mental articulation to be a serviceable accomplice too. In class, we took a human relationship as a point of view. Looking at a personal marriage (or any relationship) we learned what the happening can serve to do (know why we incline a person to another). Also, to understand what even comforts someone regarding all nouns. Surrealism could be a period when people utilized art to figure out what is comfortable, but the reason why I include surrealism in this post is for two reasons. The first reason is that the surrealist movement for historians acts as a point to reference in time. This point in time is unique to human emotions; emotions can be included in explaining the happening. The second reason is that things that unconsciously equal a happening could pose as a point of confusion in understanding. For I do not discern all things that happen unconsciously done by planning.  The sensation that can be described by the word happening has the opportunity to be an omnipresent situation. Daily we have the opportunity to share experiences with other people. Two weeks ago we covered information talking about individuality more keenly. Dr Redick affirmed the idea of autonomy. You are in your own position at all times and cannot share absolutely everything. When you are unconscious of this, it goes into a place of ignorance, which the happening does not seem to account for until after the happening itself. Ultimately leading me to say that his idea is not designed wholeheartedly to be associated with "a" time when explaining. 

I am open to being incorrect in this blog and even lead a bit confusion. In order to fully understand the "happening".  I have done little research on what other scholars have talked about concerning the idea of the happening. But I am looking forward to doing more reconnaissance. To deepen an understanding. But this blog represents my "learning" stance or my approach to learning the condition.  Next Blog might tap into this idea of what C.S Lewis considers to be material. As this to me was an idea of interest brought up in class in relation to Narnia.  

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

McDermott The Social Ethic

Tyler van Opstal "Inklings Apart"

Tyler van Opstal "Here There Be Dragons"